Which of the following is NOT a recommended practice when evaluating a website's credibility?

When evaluating a website's credibility, it is important to be critical and discerning about the sources of information. One effective practice is to check the author's credentials, which helps determine whether the writer has relevant qualifications or experience in the subject area. Verifying the publication date is also crucial, as it ensures the information is current and reflects the latest developments or understandings in a field. Examining the domain address can provide insight into the website's purpose and reliability, as certain domains are associated with educational or governmental institutions that typically uphold higher standards of credibility.

In contrast, assuming that all .com websites are credible is not a recommended practice. The .com domain is commonly used by a variety of organizations, including commercial businesses, blogs, or personal websites, which may not be reliable sources of information. This assumption can lead to misinformation or the use of unverified sources, negatively impacting the quality of research or understanding in a given topic area. Therefore, it is vital to analyze each site on its own merits rather than categorizing all websites with a certain domain as trustworthy.